Columbia Missourian 1967-06-23 'An Unhappy but Vital Debate' |
Previous | 7 of 188 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
aro m an w v r I An Unhappy U but vit but Vital i D Debate te 11 The Warren Commission made the most extensive investigation of an assassination in the history of the United States It presented its con eon conclusion elusion in a report and 26 supporting volumes But did it solve who killed President President President dent John F. F F Kennedy Some say not n t. t More More and and their number is apparently growing some growing some somehow how feel without knowing exactly why that justice was not done I For one thing there are all aU those books By Mark Lane Edward Jay Epstein Leo Sauvage And there i is New Orleans where a man feces ces ces trial for what Dist Atty Jim Gar Gar- Garrison Garrison rison says was a conspiracy to assas assas- assassinate assassin assassinate sinate sin ate the president ill ht A court of law will decide in New I Orleans But who will decide the many manyI more uneasy and unsettling questions I f. f raised by the critics of the Warren Commission History most likely But history can be helped For seven months months' an Associated Press team of Sid Moody and Bernard Gavzer has been investigating the re reo report re- re report port and its critics The reporters have read what the critics said what they said the report said and what the report actually did say They are not always the same Moody Moo y and Gavzer weighed the criticisms point by point against the volume 26 Warren Report text They have come pp with conclusions that thata a lot is RIGHT about the Warren Report And a lot is WRONG about its critics Their story fitted titled The Ling Ling- Lingering Lingering Lingering ering Shadow the Warren Re aili i t t t l port and Its Critics runs some words and aDd is the longest l single story ever sent over AP wires Its length reflects the care and depth of their probe The story will be bo carried in a special section n of f The Sunday Sanday Missourian The story does not answer all the questions raised raise about the Warren Re Re- port Rather it deals at length with some of the central areas of the as as- In these areas it asks of cl the critics Did you tell the truth the tha whole truth and nothing thing n but the truth And it finds they did dd not alway do so We think such an analysis is an important service in an unhappy but vital public debate We think Ameri Amen Americans Americans cans should read it The Columbia Missourian J i t VA W 1 The Lingering Lingering Shadow Iti The Report A s t 14 1 g ya a 1 IN F tl WH A v IW il s I
Object Description
Title | Columbia Missourian Newspaper 1967-06-23 |
Description | 59th Year, No. 236 |
Subject |
Columbia (Mo.) -- Newspapers Boone County (Mo.) -- Newspapers |
Coverage | United States -- Missouri -- Boone County -- Columbia |
Language | English |
Date | 1967-06-23 |
Type | Newspapers |
Format | |
Collection Name | Columbia Missourian Newspaper Collection |
Publisher.Digital | University of Missour Library Systems |
Rights | These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for distribution or publication. |
Contributing Institution |
State Historical Society of Missouri University of Missouri--Columbia. School of Journalism |
Copy Request | Contact the State Historical Society of Missouri at: (800) 747-6366 or (573) 882-7083 or email contact@shsmo.org. Some fees apply: http://shsmo.org/research/researchfees |
County |
Boone County (Mo.) |
Description
Title | Columbia Missourian 1967-06-23 'An Unhappy but Vital Debate' |
Coverage | United States -- Missouri -- Boone County -- Columbia |
Language | English |
Date | 1967-06-23 |
Type | article |
Format | |
Collection Name | Is part of Columbia Missourian Collection |
Publisher.Digital | University of Missour Library Systems |
Item.Transcript | aro m an w v r I An Unhappy U but vit but Vital i D Debate te 11 The Warren Commission made the most extensive investigation of an assassination in the history of the United States It presented its con eon conclusion elusion in a report and 26 supporting volumes But did it solve who killed President President President dent John F. F F Kennedy Some say not n t. t More More and and their number is apparently growing some growing some somehow how feel without knowing exactly why that justice was not done I For one thing there are all aU those books By Mark Lane Edward Jay Epstein Leo Sauvage And there i is New Orleans where a man feces ces ces trial for what Dist Atty Jim Gar Gar- Garrison Garrison rison says was a conspiracy to assas assas- assassinate assassin assassinate sinate sin ate the president ill ht A court of law will decide in New I Orleans But who will decide the many manyI more uneasy and unsettling questions I f. f raised by the critics of the Warren Commission History most likely But history can be helped For seven months months' an Associated Press team of Sid Moody and Bernard Gavzer has been investigating the re reo report re- re report port and its critics The reporters have read what the critics said what they said the report said and what the report actually did say They are not always the same Moody Moo y and Gavzer weighed the criticisms point by point against the volume 26 Warren Report text They have come pp with conclusions that thata a lot is RIGHT about the Warren Report And a lot is WRONG about its critics Their story fitted titled The Ling Ling- Lingering Lingering Lingering ering Shadow the Warren Re aili i t t t l port and Its Critics runs some words and aDd is the longest l single story ever sent over AP wires Its length reflects the care and depth of their probe The story will be bo carried in a special section n of f The Sunday Sanday Missourian The story does not answer all the questions raised raise about the Warren Re Re- port Rather it deals at length with some of the central areas of the as as- In these areas it asks of cl the critics Did you tell the truth the tha whole truth and nothing thing n but the truth And it finds they did dd not alway do so We think such an analysis is an important service in an unhappy but vital public debate We think Ameri Amen Americans Americans cans should read it The Columbia Missourian J i t VA W 1 The Lingering Lingering Shadow Iti The Report A s t 14 1 g ya a 1 IN F tl WH A v IW il s I |
Contributing Institution | State Historical Society of Missouri <br> University of Missouri School of Journalism |
Copy Request | Contact the State Historical Society of Missouri at: (800) 747-6366 or (573) 882-7083 or email contact@shsmo.org. Some fees apply: http://shsmo.org/research/researchfees |